[ WHY US ]
We didn’t invent these six commitments. We read about ten thousand customer reviews of the agencies and SaaS tools we compete with, found what people complained about most, and made the opposite our default.
The #1 complaint about every digital agency we surveyed: "They were great in the first 30 days, then everything went quiet." Reviews of the leading paid-media agencies consistently report performance plateaus after three months and a "set it and forget it" pattern post-onboarding. Agencies bill for a deliverable, hand it over, and the optimisation stops.
Our model is the inverse. Every service is built around agent-managed workflows that operate continuously — bids adjusted daily, content refreshed on schedule, scans run on cadence, alerts triaged in real time. You get a written report every week. Not "check the dashboard." A written report that says what we did, what improved, what didn’t, and what we’re testing next.
Customers of the most-reviewed SEO and paid-media agencies describe a documented pattern: senior strategists promised in the sales call, junior team members assigned the day work starts. Reviews of the major Google Ads agencies mention account managers reassigned "four times in one year." Even tier-one HubSpot and Salesforce implementation partners get called out on G2 for needing to be "chased for communication" once the implementation phase ends.
One senior person owns your engagement end to end. Their face is on the proposal. Their name is on the weekly report. They don’t get reassigned because there’s a bigger client to chase. If they leave, you get a six-month overlap with their replacement, not a three-line email saying who’s taking over.
Some popular paid-media platforms advertise "from $49 / month" while customers report actual annual costs of $15,000–$48,900 once hidden tiers kick in. Some session-recording vendors describe 40% price hikes instantly after acquisitions, with tier definitions that became "extremely hard to follow." Auto-renewal lock-in is a recurring complaint on the BBB across the major CRM platforms. Some big-name SEO retainers run $2,800/month with vague deliverables and complaints describing the model as "expensive packages, poor results, demand more money."
Our pricing page has the prices. Real numbers, by service, with what’s included. Month-to-month after the initial commitment period — 30-day cancellation notice, no early-termination penalty, no "exit interview" required. Renewal at the same price, never an "inflation adjustment" surprise. Every invoice itemises what we did that month.
The dominant session-recording and behaviour-analytics tools all share visitor data with third parties: passed into post-acquisition data pipelines, fed back to vendor-owned enterprise platforms, or routed through tooling that mandates precise location collection. Many require manual PII masking that’s easy to misconfigure. Adding insult: most charge GDPR compliance as an enterprise upgrade.
Our session recording is privacy-first by construction: no cookies, no third-party trackers loaded on your site, no visitor data sent to any external analytics vendor. PII is masked at capture, never in replay. EU-resident, GDPR-ready, cookie-banner-not-required. Same principles apply across our analytics and monitoring services: your visitors’ data stays with you.
The major session-replay tools bill by tracked users — G2 reviews are full of "costs escalate quickly as you scale." Some popular monitoring platforms charge per responder plus usage; small teams report unpredictable bills once trial limits are passed. Synthetic monitoring on the big observability platforms is famously called "unpredictable" and "confusing pricing" on every comparison blog. Some session-recording vendors auto-renew at higher rates with refund refusal.
Our monitoring, recording, and scanning services bill on flat monthly plans. Add ten monitors or ten thousand — same price tier. Record a thousand sessions or a million — same price tier. You know what next month’s invoice will say before this month’s ends. No "surprise scaling overage" emails. No quotas that punish you for success.
Some scanners market a "zero false positive" guarantee that G2 reviews routinely dispute. Others raise findings that reappear in subsequent scans even after they’ve been marked closed. Some monitoring platforms alert so often, teams describe building habits to ignore them. False positives don’t just waste your engineers’ time — they train teams to ignore real issues, which is how breaches happen.
Every finding our pen testing service raises is manually verified by a human before it lands in your inbox. Automated retest after you mark something fixed — built into the workflow, not an enterprise upgrade. Findings that re-appear are flagged as regressions and prioritised. Your team gets the signal-to-noise ratio they need to actually pay attention.
Tell us where you are and what you’ve tried. We’ll put together an honest proposal.
Contact us → See our pricing